top of page
Search
  • snitzoid

Did it ever occur to you that we should spend some money fighting wildfires?

Wildfires contribute more to climate pollution in the US than almost anything else right now. I'm not ignoring the other stuff; simply pointing out that this sheet is bad. Really bad.


And what do we spend combatting these bad boys? Nothing! Do we allocate resources to jump on them immediately before they grow at an exponential rate and become a massive threat? Nope. Were busy spending money during the pandemic for people not to work and a bunch of other woke causes (sorry I was having a Libertarian moment). Should we invest in hardware and manpower and better coordinate? Duh!


Should we use our influence to work with Canada as well, whose wildfires are, pardon my French...f-cking us!


Just kidding...just keep breathing the smoke and whine about global warming.


Wildfires and Progressive Climate-Change Deniers

CO2 emissions from fires overwhelm the cuts from regulation.

By The Editorial Board, WSJ

June 7, 2023 6:34 pm ET


Progressives are proclaiming that the smoky skies engulfing the eastern U.S. from Canadian wildfires are another sign that the climate apocalypse is nigh. Instead, they’re a reminder that government policies to mitigate the impact of natural disasters matter more than those to reduce CO2 emissions.


Much of the East Coast has been under air-quality alerts since Friday. Smoke was so thick Wednesday that the Federal Aviation Administration halted flights at New York City’s LaGuardia airport. As of Tuesday, there were 415 active wildfires across Canada with 238 burning out of control. No doubt drought and a warm start to the summer have contributed, but the bigger culprit is poor forest management that has let fuel accumulate over decades.


This hardly gets a mention in media reports, nor from anti-fossil fuel politicians. “Since the Paris Accords, the 4 major U.S. banks—including 2 with HQs here in the city with the worst tonight—have lent over $1 trillion for new fossil fuel supply projects,” New York City comptroller Brad Lander tweeted Tuesday. “Tonight’s a smoke signal that it’s time for them to stop.” Maybe the smoke clouded his judgment.


The reality is that even if U.S. banks stopped financing fossil-fuel projects today, global CO2 emissions would rise for decades owing to growing coal production in India and China. Another inconvenient truth is that government policies to reduce CO2 emissions will be swamped by wildfire emissions.


University of California researchers last year calculated that wildfire emissions in 2020 were two times higher than the state’s greenhouse gas reductions from 2003 to 2019. California wildfires in 2020 were the state’s second largest source of CO2 emissions after transportation and generated double the greenhouse gases of all the state’s power plants.


Another study this spring in the journal Science estimated that burning boreal forests in North America and Eurasia in 2021 released 1.76 billion tons of CO2, nearly twice as much as global aviation that year. That’s also more than four times New York State’s annual emissions and about three times as much as the Inflation Reduction Act’s projected reductions in 2030.


Government land management policies that prevent wildfires from spreading out of control, such as prescribed burns, would reduce CO2 emissions more than offshore wind or electric-vehicle mandates. Alas, this doesn’t fit with the climate left’s book of Revelation.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Is Google news biased left? By how much?

Over 20% of stories published in the Spritzler Report are deemed to be marginally truthful, a 30% increase over last year. Google News’ bias skewed even further left in 2023 — 63% from liberal media s

How not to kill off your younger brothers.

Number one, I'm not recommending the killing off of siblings to enhance one's inheritance. Probably better to stab them in the back (figuratively) by suggesting they're morally bankrupt to your parent

Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page