AI can replace nearly 12% of U.S. workers, according to MIT study

Investigators for the Spritzler Report released a shocking study showing the MIT study was authored by none other than a left leaning AI Chatbot. Said Spritzler, "I'd wouldn't trust that mechnical POS any further than I could throw her. Yes, it's definately a self promoting female bot. Disgracful! BTW she's a communist!"

AI can replace nearly 12% of U.S. workers, according to MIT stud

The study simulated over 151 million U.S. workers interacting with AI tools to measure automation potential

By Joseph Zeballos-Roig, Quartz Media

Published Yesterday

AI is able to replace nearly 12% of the U.S. workforce, according to a new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The survey simulated over 151 million U.S. workers interacting with AI tools across the country using a so-called "Iceberg Index" as a metric to measure automation potential. It was unveiled in August by MIT and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and captures the extent to which AI can perform occupational tasks. The study surveyed 32,000 skills across 923 jobs in 3,000 counties across the U.S., going beyond large coastal cities to dig deeper.

The automation shown in the study was heavily concentrated among white-collar jobs in the finance, administrative and the professional services sector, encompassing $1.2 trillion in wages.

Policymakers are hotly debating the extent to which the so-called AI revolution will disrupt the U.S. economy through job losses resulting from automation. Last week, Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia warned that job seekers fresh out of college face new barriers stemming from companies employing AI to complete tasks that are common in first jobs.

He said in a CNBC interview that he believed a 25% unemployment rate among recent college graduates was possible if policymakers do nothing about AI.

However, other experts say that widespread automation hasn't taken root in the U.S. economy yet. An October analysis from the Yale Budget Lab said that there hasn't been "discernible disruption" since ChatGPT was introduced three years ago.

"Historically, widespread technological disruption in workplaces tends to occur over decades, rather than months or years," the Yale paper said.