top of page
Search

Where do doctors use AI?

snitzoid
Sep 28
4 min read

The chatbot will see you now.


1. China Leads Clinicians' AI Use

According to Elsevier's Clinician of the Future 2025 survey of 2,206 clinicians across 109 countries, 48% now use AI for work, nearly double the 26% a year earlier.


🇨🇳 China leads the survey at 71%.


At the other end, 🇺🇸 the United States sits at 36% and 🇬🇧 the United Kingdom at 34%, the two lowest rates recorded.


Nearly all clinicians who use AI (97%) have tried a general-purpose tool such as ChatGPT. Looking ahead, 70% expect clinical AI tools to save them time, 58% expect faster diagnoses, and 54% expect more accurate ones.


💡 Worth noting: the 37-point gap between China and the UK is larger than the UK's entire adoption rate.



2. India's Patients Lead the World

Turn from clinicians to patients, and a different country comes out on top. Boston Consulting Group surveyed more than 13,000 adults across 15 countries about using AI for their own health, and 57% said they do.


🇮🇳 India leads at 85%, followed by 🇧🇷 Brazil at 67% and 🇨🇳 China at 62%.


🇺🇸 The United States comes in at 50%, 🇩🇪 Germany at 44%, 🇬🇧 the United Kingdom at 43%, and 🇯🇵 Japan at 34%.


Use falls steeply with age: 78% of Gen Z and 71% of Millennials use AI for health, compared with 50% of Gen X and 31% of Baby Boomers.


Chatbots are the most common entry point, used by 33% of respondents, ahead of AI-enabled wearables at 19%. Some 55% want AI to book appointments and manage referrals, but only 22% are comfortable with AI triaging a heart attack.


🔎 The gap worth sitting with: India's 85% is exactly two and a half times Japan's 34%.



3. What Clinicians Actually Use It For

Philips' Future Health Index 2026 asked more than 2,000 healthcare professionals across 10 countries how they use AI day to day.


Fifty-two percent use it to transcribe clinical notes, 46% use generative AI as a professional "buddy" to talk through ideas, 45% use it to suggest diagnoses from symptoms, and 44% use it to flag dangerous drug combinations.


Nearly six in ten (58%) report workflow efficiency gains, and more than a third say AI now lets them see more patients, by a median of five extra patients a week.


📊 Worth remembering: note-taking leads the list, seven points ahead of diagnosis suggestions.


4. 1,614 Medical Devices and Counting

🇺🇸 The United States has now authorized 1,614 AI-enabled medical devices, up from 1,451 a year earlier, according to The Medical Futurist's analysis of the FDA's latest annual update.


Radiology accounts for 1,230 of them, about 76%, with cardiovascular a distant second at 154 devices and neurology third at 76.


The pace keeps climbing: the FDA authorized 6 AI devices in 2015, 225 in 2023, 235 in 2024, and 335 in 2025.


🔮 A trend worth watching: as of September 2026, not one device on the FDA's list uses generative AI or a large language model.



5. Sweden's Mammogram Trial

🇸🇪 Sweden's MASAI trial randomly assigned more than 100,000 women at four screening sites to either AI-supported mammography or standard double reading by two radiologists.


AI-supported screening detected 29% more cancers and cut radiologists' reading workload by 44%. In the two years afterward, women in the AI group were diagnosed with 12% fewer cancers between screenings, including 27% fewer aggressive subtypes.


The AI triaged low-risk scans to a single radiologist and high-risk scans to two.


🔎 The takeaway worth holding onto: it was the first randomised controlled trial of its kind, and the extra detections came without a rise in false positives.



6. Britain's Own Test

🇬🇧 The United Kingdom ran its own evaluation in NHS Grampian, where an AI tool supported the screening of 10,889 women and raised cancer detection by 10.4%.


The same evaluation, published in Nature Cancer in March 2026, found the tool could cut healthcare workers' workload by more than 30% and shorten the time to notify affected women from 14 days to 3.


Every mammogram in the UK programme is currently read by two radiologists, across more than 2 million examinations a year, and a larger trial called EDITH will test the approach at sites across the country.


🔎 The honest takeaway: with 2 million mammograms a year each read twice, a workload cut of 30% or more would free up a great deal of specialist time.



7. American Physicians Say Yes, and Worry

🇺🇸 In the United States, 81% of physicians now use AI in their practice, according to the American Medical Association's 2026 survey, more than double the 38% recorded in 2023.


Doctors now report an average of 2.3 uses each, up from 1.1 in 2023, led by summarizing medical research and documenting clinical care.


More than three-quarters say AI improves their ability to care for patients, up from 65% in 2023, and 70% see it as a way to automate tasks that contribute to burnout.


Yet 88% are concerned about potential skill loss, particularly among physicians with 10 years or less in practice.


👩‍⚕️ The bigger picture: about 40% of physicians say they feel equally excited and concerned, a sign that fast adoption and open worry are moving together.



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
City back in play for Bears?

I still suspect they'll end up in Arlington Heights. I will continue to avoid buying tickets. City back in play for Bears? By Monica Eng, Justin Kaufmann and Carrie Shepherd, Axios News Oct 15, 2026

 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by The Spritzler Report. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page